| From Pat Kneisler: "... here's
an excellent, excellent piece for
your Sunday morning reading, Roger.
This has to be one of the most
evenhanded, calm, non-judgemental
statements of what is wrong with
US policy regarding the Muslim
world that I have read in quite
a while. And he has some extraordinary
poll numbers to back him up. I
found the link to this over at
Juan Cole's blog ..." |
It's the Policy, Stupid
Political Islam and US Foreign Policy
by John L. Esposito
John L. Esposito is University Professor
of Religion & International Affairs
and Director of the Prince Alwaleed
Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian
Understanding at Georgetown University.
He is the author of Unholy War: Terror
in the Name of Islam and co-author
with Dalia Mogahed of Can You Hear
Me Now? Listening to the Voices of
1 Billion Muslims (forthcoming).
Link to Illustration of Gallup Study
Preliminary Findings.
US foreign policy and political Islam
today are deeply intertwined. Every
US president since Jimmy Carter has
had to deal with political Islam; none
has been so challenged as George W.
Bush. Policymakers, particularly since
9/11, have demonstrated an inability
and/or unwillingness to distinguish
between radical and moderate Islamists.
They have largely treated political
Islam as a global threat similar to
the way that Communism was perceived.
However, even in the case of Communism,
foreign policymakers eventually moved
from an ill-informed, broad-brush,
and paranoid approach personified by
Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s
to more nuanced, pragmatic, and reasonable
policies that led to the establishment
of relations with China in the 1970s,
even as tensions remained between the
United States and the Soviet Union.
As Islamist parties continue to rise
in prominence across the globe, it
is necessary that policymakers learn
to make distinctions and adopt differentiated
policy approaches. This requires a
deeper understanding of what motivates
and informs Islamist parties and the
support they receive, including the
ways in which some US policies feed
the more radical and extreme Islamist
movements while weakening the appeal
of the moderate organizations to Muslim
populations. It also requires the political
will to adopt approaches of engagement
and dialogue. This is especially important
where the roots of political Islam
go deeper than simple anti-Americanism
and where political Islam is manifested
in non-violent and democratic ways.
The stunning electoral victories of
HAMAS in Palestine and the Shi’a
in Iraq, the Muslim Brotherhood’s
emergence as the leading parliamentary
opposition in Egypt, and Israel’s
war against HAMAS and Hizbollah go
to the heart of issues of democracy,
terrorism, and peace in the Middle
East.
http://hir.harvard.edu/articles/1453/1/